Requests for money, crypto or account access
Especially when a new romantic connection creates urgency around the request.
Release 2 preview
Notice warning signals without pretending software can prove a person is safe.
Trust Check is planned as calibrated decision support for suspicious patterns such as money requests, investment pitches, unusual urgency, contradictory stories, pressure and suspicious links.
Calibrated result language
Several things are worth slowing down for.
A future result should identify patterns and suggest reasonable next questions, not issue a “safe person” certificate.
Concern levelCheck further
Money request appeared earlyStory changed around travel detailsRepeated urgency to move off-platform
Signals worth checking
Patterns matter more than one awkward detail.
Trust Check should help users slow a decision down when several warning signals cluster together.
Pressure to act before you can verify
Artificial deadlines can make people skip the normal questions they would otherwise ask.
Important details that repeatedly change
One mistake is not proof. A pattern of inconsistent explanations can justify slowing down.
Demanding trust while avoiding ordinary verification
A person who expects unusually high trust while refusing reasonable context deserves more scrutiny.
Strict privacy boundary
Checking a pattern is not permission to invade someone's life.
No doxxing
No home-address discovery, workplace tracing or private-record hunting.
No safety guarantee
The tool will not output “Safe Person,” “100% Scammer” or other certainty the evidence cannot support.
No coercive investigation
FBF should suggest reasonable questions and risk-reduction actions, not stalking or confrontation tactics.